- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:21:33 -0700
- To: "Ilia Goranov" <css-babailiica@babailiica.com>, <www-style@w3.org>, "Bruce Lawson" <bruce@brucelawson.co.uk>
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 07:23:07 UTC
----- Original Message ----- From: Bruce Lawson To: Andrew Fedoniouk ; Ilia Goranov ; www-style@w3.org Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:00 PM Subject: Re: Select a parrent node with s CSS selector? Again it is possible to compute this but selectors that have exponential nature are *highly* non-desirable. Again, I understand the potential complexity, but don't remember the part of this group's terms of reference that limits discussion to non-exponential algorithms. Processors are getting faster all the time. People have expressed a wish for such a selector. I fail to see why discussion of it is automatically out of scope. People express many good wishes, say perpetuum mobile is just a perfect one. Please define the scope. Is it scope of abstract selectors or the one that includes only feasible things? Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 07:23:07 UTC