Re: Generated content via URI

The CSS WG agreed with my reply[2] to Spartanicus's comment[1] about 
ignoring vs flagging an image that fails to download. Thus, the CSS 
level 2 spec is unchanged and still allows the UA to decide whether to 
ignore or flag the missing image (but we expect an enhancement to the 
'content' property in CSS3 that lets the author decide).


Spartanicus, should we note in the forthcoming "Disposition of comments" 
that you disagree with this resolution, based on [3]? Or can you in 
fact accept it?


(For reference, this is issue 12 in the forthcoming "Disposition of 

For the CSS WG,

  Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C )                               W3C/ERCIM                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
  +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France

Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 16:59:01 UTC