- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:42:06 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:46:13 +0200, Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
wrote:
>> The "URI" in the original grammar is merely the following
>> lexical token: "url("{w}{string}{w}")". It says nothing
>> about the validity of the URI itself.
>
> It is, IMHO, a matter of deep regret that "URI" is not
> defined as
>
> "url"{w}"("{w}{string}{w}")"
It seems reasonably consistent with the way you invoke a function in a
number of programming languages, such as ECMAScript, not?
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 16:42:23 UTC