W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2006

Re: [css3-namespace] url() syntax

From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:46:13 +0100
Message-ID: <450584C5.9090308@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: werner.donne@re.be
CC: www-style@w3.org

Werner Donné wrote:

> The "URI" in the original grammar is merely the following
> lexical token: "url("{w}{string}{w}")". It says nothing
> about the validity of the URI itself.

It is, IMHO, a matter of deep regret that "URI" is not
defined as


As it stands, it panders to the needs of those who
habitually place white space between the parentheses
and the string, whilst totally alienating those who
habitually place white space before the open
parenthesis.  Is there any possibility that both
groups could be treated equally in some not-
too-distant re-write of the specification ?

Philip Taylor
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 15:46:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:26 UTC