- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:52:17 +0200
- To: François Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thursday, September 7, 2006, 7:45:40 PM, François wrote: FY> Anne van Kesteren a écrit: >> On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 22:17:12 +0200, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> >> wrote: >> > 2) Since this module is about namespaces, we believe it should make >> > a normative, rather than an informative, reference to Namespaces 1.0 >> > and Namespaces 1.1... >> How does that cover the theoretical Namespaces 2.0, Namespaces for >> HTML and Namespaces for Tree-based-language Triple-X? FY> It doesn't. If the Namespaces module wants to do that, it needs to FY> define its own terms, not lamely say "The terminology used in this FY> specification is that of [XML-NAMES11]." and then pretend the reference FY> is not normative. There needs to be a normative definition of what FY> you're talking about somewhere. I agree (clearly the XML namespace specifications should be normative references). FY> BTW the terminology is *not* used as in [XML-NAMES11] (but should be, FY> IMHO). For example, first sentence of Section 3: "The @namespace FY> at-rule declares a namespace prefix and associates it with a given FY> namespace (a string)." A namespace is not a string; it is identified by FY> a string, which [XML-NAMES11] calls the namespace name. So "The @namespace at-rule declares a namespace prefix and associates it with a given namespace name (a string)." would respond to your comment. FY> There's another FY> case not far below: "it is the expanded name (the tuple of local name FY> and namespace) that is significant." [XML-NAMES11] says: "[Definition: FY> An expanded name is a pair consisting of a namespace name and a local FY> name. ]" So "it is the expanded name (the tuple of local name and namespace name) that is significant." Did you spot any other instances of incorrect use of terminology besides these two? If so, could you list them? -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 17:52:30 UTC