- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:43:19 +0200
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 10:25:38 PM, Anne wrote: AvK> On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 22:17:12 +0200, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote: >> 2) Since this module is about namespaces, we believe it should make >> a normative, rather than an informative, reference to Namespaces 1.0 >> and Namespaces 1.1. Both are needed to handle both XML 1.0 and XML 1.1 >> documents. In addition, the references should be to the undated >> (latest) >> versions of these documents rather than to specific dated editions. AvK> How does that cover the theoretical Namespaces 2.0, Namespaces for HTML AvK> and Namespaces for Tree-based-language Triple-X? Which is why the specification should clearly state that it is about CSS and XML namespaces (1.0 and 1.1), not about, say, Perl namespaces or flying ducks or whatever -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 17:43:33 UTC