- From: François Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 13:19:13 -0700
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Chris Lilley a écrit : > FY> BTW the terminology is *not* used as in [XML-NAMES11] (but should be, > FY> IMHO). For example, first sentence of Section 3: "The @namespace > FY> at-rule declares a namespace prefix and associates it with a given > FY> namespace (a string)." A namespace is not a string; it is identified by > FY> a string, which [XML-NAMES11] calls the namespace name. > > So "The @namespace at-rule declares a namespace prefix and associates it > with a given namespace name (a string)." would respond to your comment. Yes. > FY> There's another > FY> case not far below: "it is the expanded name (the tuple of local name > FY> and namespace) that is significant." [XML-NAMES11] says: "[Definition: > FY> An expanded name is a pair consisting of a namespace name and a local > FY> name. ]" > > So "it is the expanded name (the tuple of local name and namespace name) > that is significant." Yes again. > Did you spot any other instances of incorrect use of terminology besides > these two? If so, could you list them? No, looks good. -- François
Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 20:19:25 UTC