- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:33:13 +0100
- To: Craig Francis <craig@synergycms.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Craig Francis wrote: > A fair point, but please can you explain which is the correct method of > marking up the headers (first example given, under the heading "my > problem"). There is no one true correct way of doing anything within the limited vocabulary offered by HTML. Whether something is an H1 or H2 will matter to search engines, but it's only one of many "ingredients" that will influence a page's ranking and indexing. > Personally I think presentation effects interpretation, and the rules I > propose are for changing that interpretation and not the structure of > the page. Presentation may affect *subjective* interpretation, but meaning should not be imparted solely via styling. A document needs to be understandable without styles. > For example a <ul> of links is because they are an unordered list of > links... its then presented to the user/device to show that its a > navigation bar... but I suppose that interpretation could also be > expressed in mark-up. Although how would you create all the HTML > elements required for all the different data types (there could be > allot)... I suppose they could be attributes (<ul type="nav">). This goes outside of the www-style list...the www-html list may be a more appropriate forum for this. Suffice to say: HTML offers a very limited set of elements. Beyond microformats or similar attempts at cramming further semantics into the very generic elements, or using linked resources (such as RDF files, for instance), there's not much you can do - and even there, you're relying on search engines actually caring about any of those things. As an aside, I remember how at some point MAP was touted as being a good markup structure for navigation etc... You may want to look at the proposed developments in XHTML 2.0 (specifically the "role" attribute and navigation list element) P -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 5 July 2006 23:33:26 UTC