- From: HeroreV <herorev@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:49:16 -0800 (PST)
- To: W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
--- Ben Ward <benmward@gmail.com> wrote: > At the moment background-image is a sting, but using > an indexed syntax changes it to an array. That's > hugely relevant to DOM Scripting (and I suspect > also to the internals of existing web browsers). > It's not backwards compatible with the 'old' > background property, so it's really not an option. The new arrays in the CSS-OM could have plural names. Setting a value for backgroundImages[0] would also set a value for backgroundImage. This is similar to how setting a value for element.style.background can also set values for element.style.backgroundImage, element.style.backgroundColor, etc. This method would also make testing for support of multiple backgrounds easier. Alternatively, the UA could just grab any assignments to backgroudImage and automatically set it to backgroundImage[0]. It's going to have to examin all assignments anyway. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 01:49:21 UTC