- From: Adam Kuehn <akuehn@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:34:48 -0500
- To: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
At 12:16 PM 2/3/2006, Philip TAYLOR wrote: >Good, I like that re-casting, but it leaves undefined the behaviour >of a browser that supports "run-in" but not "inline"; that situation, >too, deserves clarification, IMHO ... Just to be clear, the behavior you are concerned about would not be undefined, just "unexampled". In any case, my suggestion was designed to make only an editorial change sufficient to address the ambiguity concern. I do not personally feel that a substantive change is necessary, since every UA I'm aware of already gets this right. -Adam Kuehn
Received on Friday, 3 February 2006 17:35:07 UTC