- From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 17:16:23 +0000
- To: Adam Kuehn <akuehn@nc.rr.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Good, I like that re-casting, but it leaves undefined the behaviour of a browser that supports "run-in" but not "inline"; that situation, too, deserves clarification, IMHO ... Philip Taylor -------- Adam Kuehn wrote: > > >> When I was reading the text, I saw an inconsistency. I attached the >> partition that I saw the problem, in jpeg format. > > > > I would recommend recasting that text (Section 4.3.8 Unsupported Values, > the text immediately following the example) to avoid ambiguity as follows: > > "A UA that supports both 'inline' and 'run-in' values for the display > property will accept the first display declaration and then "write over" > that value with the second display declaration. A UA that supports the > 'inline' value but not the 'run-in' value will accept the first display > declaration and ignore the second." > >
Received on Friday, 3 February 2006 17:16:52 UTC