- From: Noah Scales <noahjscales@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:58:21 -0800 (PST)
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, www-style@w3.org
Hello, Mr. Woolley. --- David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> wrote: > > > The result of applying a CSS 3.0 stylesheet to an > > XML document, if it were serialized, may have > > different > Here I mean that the result of transforming XML with a CSS 3.0 stylesheet, if the transformation's result were (could be) serialized ... > All XML documents are serialised. XML is a tool for > serialising tree structures. I think you are causing > a lot of confusion by using the term serialized to > mean something other than the normal meaining. > So if XML is a tool for serializing, you must mean that a document in XML form is a serialization of an abstract tree structure. In your mind, are only text files serializations, or can graphic files be serializations as well? (I don't mean pictures of XML files, here). -Noah __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Saturday, 4 February 2006 00:58:25 UTC