- From: Alastair Campbell <ac@alastc.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:07:40 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Andrés wrote: > You ask for a use, I gave you an use. A use which would be better implemented without CSS. > WAI guideline says that? well, stop putting blink as an option for > text-decoration. I believe that's the case: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-fonts/#font-effect-prop Bit late for CSS 1/2 though. > And no, it isn't better a gif, it can't be scaled, a simple character is > better. A GIF (or PNG) with a width defined in EMs would scale (reasonable well I believe), not to mention vector based formats (e.g. Flash, SVG). I would consider an animated GIF easiest to produce though. > Sincerely, I can't understand you. I think I've ground to a halt on this one, apologies for the list for extending it this long. -Alastair
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2006 15:07:49 UTC