- From: Andrés <adelfino@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:13:13 -0300
- To: www-style@w3.org
That blinking "_" would be an effect, so, it's a style thing. I wouldn't want my visitors to see it if they chose not to see style content. On 8/15/06, Alastair Campbell <ac@alastc.com> wrote: > > Andrés wrote: > > You ask for a use, I gave you an use. > > A use which would be better implemented without CSS. > > > WAI guideline says that? well, stop putting blink as an option for > > text-decoration. > > I believe that's the case: > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-fonts/#font-effect-prop > > Bit late for CSS 1/2 though. > > > And no, it isn't better a gif, it can't be scaled, a simple character is > > better. > > A GIF (or PNG) with a width defined in EMs would scale (reasonable well > I believe), not to mention vector based formats (e.g. Flash, SVG). I > would consider an animated GIF easiest to produce though. > > > Sincerely, I can't understand you. > > I think I've ground to a halt on this one, apologies for the list for > extending it this long. > > -Alastair > > -- Andrés Delfino
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2006 15:13:28 UTC