- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:26:40 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Spartanicus schreef: >> An attribute instead of a label element is a bad idea. >> >> Attributes can contain no markup, such as Ruby, abbreviations, >> directionality indications, etc. They also cannot be styled conveniently. >> >> That is a major design improvement of XHTML2, and also the reason why >> e.g. the alternate text of images has moved out of the alt attribute >> into the element’s content. > > For this I would not credit XHTML2 as a "major design improvement" since > this only applies to the legacy <img> element, not to embedded/included > images in general. > > The textual alternative to an image and other embedded/included external > resources can be coded as content and thus marked up since HTML4. Another example then: the <meta> element. Okay? ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!!
Received on Friday, 28 October 2005 10:24:31 UTC