- From: Brian Sexton <discussion-w3c@ididnotoptin.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 06:55:06 -0800
- To: "Paul Duncan" <paul.duncan@marketpipe.com>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
Paul, > Thanks to standards I exclusively use font sizes specified as "x-small and > xx-small etc..." > Why? I use this as it allows the users of ALL browsers (including IE) to > change the size of the font according to their wishes. > > It's scary to note that some of those large organisations you highlighted > fix the font size (Apple at 12px) which does limit the accessibility to > their sites. Just because Internet Explorer lacks an accessibility feature that every half-decent browser has--in this case, resizing text from so-called fixed sizes--does not mean that it is the Web developer who is limiting accessibility by using fixed sizes. As I see it, in this case, there are two problems: the browser's failure to resize text set to such sizes (a failing that makes even less sense to me than using the term "favorites" to refer to bookmarks--a decent metaphor and less likely to have distasteful implications--or limiting their names to names allowed by the underlying file system) and the common notion that a particular outdated browser with poor standards support even matters when free and inexpensive browsers with better standards support and accessibility features are available for all major computer platforms. I do not think we should appeal to the failings of a particular browser--any particular browser, regardless of how common it is--as a point against using those so-called fixed sizes or anything else. Kind regards, Brian Sexton
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2005 14:55:00 UTC