- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:10:35 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Elliotte Harold wrote: > > Why is > > 6.6.6. Blank > > This section intentionally left blank. > > Are you planning to put something there? I don't expect such an omission > in a last call draft. if nothing goes here, just delete it. In the last version of this specification, section 6.6.6. defined the :contains() pseudo-class. This pseudo-class has been removed from the draft (due to lack of implementations), but we did not wish to renumber all the sections as this would cause references to this specification to become stale and incorrect. (The specification has existed with the current section numbers for over five years, and references to it exist in many places.) Please let me know if this explanation does not satisfy you. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 29 December 2005 17:11:10 UTC