Re: Selectors:Editorial: 6.6.6

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Elliotte Harold wrote:
> 
> Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> > * Elliotte Harold wrote:
> > > Why is
> > > 
> > > 6.6.6. Blank
> > > 
> > > This section intentionally left blank.
> > > 
> > > Are you planning to put something there? I don't expect such an omission
> > > in a last call draft. if nothing goes here, just delete it.
> > 
> > Well, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast_(numerology)>...
> 
> You know I was really hoping that wasn't it. Can we please leave the silly
> superstitions behind? It's just a number.

Please do not mistake Bjoern's dry humour for an actual explanation. :-)


> What's next? Making sure no specification has a chapter 13?

To be honest, while the number 13 itself has not yet been the target of 
any spec humour in the CSS working group, I'm sure it's only a matter of 
time... there is already a history of easter eggs in our specs...

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Thursday, 29 December 2005 17:15:55 UTC