- From: Craig Northway <craign@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:59:35 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: >On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Craig Northway wrote: > > >>Fair enough. A rather ill informed statement then. Perhaps some XHTML >>examples to complement the many HTML examples would be a good idea. >> >> > >There are XHTML fragments in 11.1.1, 12.1, 16.3.1, 17.5, and 17.5.3. >Basically, every example added since CSS2 has been XHTML. > >We would rather not change the existing examples because we have had very >bad experiences when doing so. Specifically, it seems every time we make a >change for editorial reasons rather than to fix a real problem, we >actually introduce a problem instead. > >Since we'd rather not introduce more problems at this stage, we'd rather >not touch the existing examples unless they are wrong. :-) > >Please let us know if this is not satisfactory. > > This is not satisfactory. As pointed out by Chris Lilley in another comment (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0266.html) the examples are not valid as there is not a DTD. Please fix the examples. Regards, Craig Northway
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 13:59:44 UTC