- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:56:30 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Karl Dubost wrote: > > There might be an intermediate possibility. A report which justify/shows what > has not been implemented. Each time there was a change or a feature dropped > in CSS 2.1 with regards to CSS 2.0. > A test case could illustrate and reports on buggy implementations and then > explain why it has been decided to drop it. Apart from satisfying idle curiosity, what would be the point? Note that what you describe above would take _months_ to write up. You may be underestimating the number of changes that have been made since CSS2. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2005 19:56:42 UTC