- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:11:11 -0400
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Le 05-08-23 à 15:56, Ian Hickson a écrit : > On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Karl Dubost wrote: >> There might be an intermediate possibility. A report which justify/ >> shows what >> has not been implemented. Each time there was a change or a >> feature dropped >> in CSS 2.1 with regards to CSS 2.0. >> A test case could illustrate and reports on buggy >> implementations and then >> explain why it has been decided to drop it. > > Apart from satisfying idle curiosity, what would be the point? > > Note that what you describe above would take _months_ to write up. > You may > be underestimating the number of changes that have been made since > CSS2. hmm (trying to understand your comment) You will have to do it for entering PR… no? -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2005 20:11:16 UTC