- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 10:20:25 -0700
- To: W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 3 October 2004 17:21:00 UTC
On Sunday 2004-10-03 03:21 -0400, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > >| > As per CSS [1] "display:table-cell" forces change of underlying DOM - > >UA > Well a "node" technically is inserted, which is an anonymous node, > meaning selectors do not match it, nor do they appear in the DOM, thus > not modifying the DOM... it is the same concept if in HTML you add an > inline element, in a spot where the html would expect a block element, > most browsers have implimented quarks behavior in these cases, so that a > block elem is placed between them and the block one that is placed is > not shown in the DOM... This simply isn't true. While a UA could manufacture a sort of node behind-the-scenes if it wants to, nothing requires it to do so, and it's certainly not related to any of the quirks or rules in HTML parsing. -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
Received on Sunday, 3 October 2004 17:21:00 UTC