- From: Justin Wood (Callek) <116057@bacon.qcc.mass.edu>
- Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 20:49:22 -0400
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
L. David Baron wrote: >On Sunday 2004-10-03 03:21 -0400, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > > >>Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: >> >> >>>| > As per CSS [1] "display:table-cell" forces change of underlying DOM - >>>UA >>> >>> > > > >>Well a "node" technically is inserted, which is an anonymous node, >>meaning selectors do not match it, nor do they appear in the DOM, thus >>not modifying the DOM... it is the same concept if in HTML you add an >>inline element, in a spot where the html would expect a block element, >>most browsers have implimented quarks behavior in these cases, so that a >>block elem is placed between them and the block one that is placed is >>not shown in the DOM... >> >> > >This simply isn't true. While a UA could manufacture a sort of node >behind-the-scenes if it wants to, nothing requires it to do so, and it's >certainly not related to any of the quirks or rules in HTML parsing. > >-David > > > ...Well thank you david for pointing out my mistake in this, (after I posted I did feel like I shouldnt have for some reason, now I know why). ~Justin Wood (Callek on moznet IRC)
Received on Monday, 4 October 2004 00:50:19 UTC