- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 09:11:43 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
> JavaScript and server-side generation are, in my opinion, bad answers > to this feature request. JavaScript is constantly used to patch up Which is why the correct place is in the authoring tool. I.e. if you want a higher level language with no additional power, edit the style sheet in that language, and convert before loading onto the server. The language is never sent over the wire, so it need not be standardised, and, in fact, there are general purpose macro processors that can probably do the job. A WYSIWYG authoring tool is likely to have a private language, anyway, although some may not save in that language. However, the need for this sort of feature is often the result of an unstructured design as, with a logical use of styling the use of multiple selectors on one set of rules or appropriate (possibly multiple on a element and certainly structural) classes should avoid the need to repeat the colour many times over.
Received on Saturday, 15 May 2004 04:20:37 UTC