- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 22:34:59 -0700
- To: "Anne van Kesteren (fora)" <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, <www-style@w3.org>
Ian Hickson about table-* display: >This is actually very poorly described by CSS2 right now, largely >because nobody actually understands the table layout algorithm, >which makes it one of the worst parts of CSS. Most implementations >are developed by reverse engineering the more popular >implementations. Anne van Kesteren about table-* display: > No. The model described is very solid. It sucks, but at least it is > solid, something you can't say from your proposal. Would you guys come up with some consensus? What sucks and what is worst? Personally, I understand the idea of tables as I've implemeted table layout also. I can say that table-* display styles logicaly conflicts with CSS box model. Mozilla rendering of <p style="display: table; white-space: nowrap;"> <span style="display: table-cell">from:</span> <input type="text" style="display: table-cell;width: 100%;"> </p> is just wrong! Following standard width of <input> must be equal to width of <P>. Seems like Mozilla is using %% units for that :))) Wohoo!!! Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Monday, 10 May 2004 01:36:30 UTC