Re: CSS: %% length unit. Proposal. Some clarifications.

>> No, with the table layout algorithm (as implemented by UAs)
>> width:100% means "make this column as wide as possible given the
>> constraints of the other columns".
> Letter 's' in your 'UAs' is just mistyping I guess. Only Mozilla is
> trying to render them properly (from Mozilla point of of view). Yep,
> 'cause "given the constraints of the other columns" has strong smell
> of fuzzy logic.

Ever heard about Opera and Safari?

>> This is actually very poorly described by CSS2 right now, largely
>> because nobody actually understands the table layout algorithm,
>> which makes it one of the worst parts of CSS. Most implementations
>> are developed by reverse engineering the more popular
>> implementations.
> In my opinion this happened because  table*-styles are "artificial"
> entities. Brave attempt to close holes. They conflict with e.g. box
> model. They create too many "if", "then", "except" across the whole
> specification.

No. The model described is very solid. It sucks, but at least it is 
solid, something you can't say from your proposal.

> Lack of  %% natural "fluid" mechanism in CSS was the main motivation
> to introduce them I guess.

Not at all. They were introduced to describe the TABLE element and 
descendents with CSS, so that one could visually style a table in XML as 

  Anne van Kesteren

Received on Monday, 10 May 2004 01:15:29 UTC