- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:20:00 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20040628202000.GA2995@darby.dbaron.org>
On Monday 2004-06-28 12:15 -0700, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > It would be nice if instead of three separate attributes width, min-width, > max-width we represent > 'width' as an aggregate or structure: > > width: 100px; /* old style */ > width: 50% (min:20px, max:100px) See also the following (and other messages in the threads): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/1999Mar/0086.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/1999Jul/0040.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/1999Jul/0057.html > The same approach could be used for 'display': > > display: block(position:float-left) > display: block(position:absolute, top:10px, ... ) > display: inline; > > Just to avoid mutualy exclusive attribute values. What is it you want to do here? I've often thought that 'position: absolute', 'position: fixed' and probably 'float: left' and 'float: right' should just be values of 'display' rather than separate properties. What advantage does your proposal have over such a change? -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 16:20:35 UTC