- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:57:46 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, <www-style@w3.org>
> L. David Baron wrote: >See also the following (and other messages in the threads): > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/1999Mar/0086.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/1999Jul/0040.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/1999Jul/0057.html Thanks David for your links. They prove that evolution indeed is sort of spiral. I've got ideas exlained there. But situation is slightly different at this time: min/max'es already here. Seems like the only way we can follow now is to declare cascading rule for width as: if 'width' is defined in the style definition it overrides previous value *and discards min and max values set in previous styles in the cascading order* So authors if they want to use width with constraints will be forced to override these three all together. Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 17:00:35 UTC