- From: Justin Wood <jw6057@bacon.qcc.mass.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:15:52 -0400
- To: W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
Justin Wood wrote: > > grr this was meant to list > > ~Justin Wood > > ....and aparantly it didnt send on forward: Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > Actually the idea is deeper on second look: > > width: 100px; > width: 50% (min:20px, max:100px); > > Percentage is a function in fact and only percentage can be and make real > sense to be accompanied with > min/max constraints. > > I dissagree "em, ex, ...." as well as % could make sense, any "flexible" sized value. ~Justin Wood
Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 16:16:46 UTC