- From: Justin Wood <jw6057@bacon.qcc.mass.edu>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:57:53 -0400
- To: W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
The following from the Color Spec (imo) need to be clarified:
currentColor: When defined on the `color` property should have same
behavior as inherit (being UA default when it is the ::root)
System Colors:
Listed as deprecated, clarification should be made for UA
conformance when dealing with deprecated values, the paragraph said some
profiles may not use it, though would a newly created CSS3-Color
conformance profile need it?
CSS3 Profiles:
Missing an entire CSS3 Profile specification, which makes it
misleading to those glancing imo (SVG and Html versions have different
conformance req's?) to some peoples eyes.
Color Keywords:
SVG Color Keywords, and HTML Color Keywords should not be seperated
in full, keep the close together, if not part of the same normative
declaration, (Include difference info in CSS Profile section at end of
document)
@color-profile:
Display error, descriptors and their corresponding value
descriptions are not indented correctly, makes for a confusing read.
'rendering-intent':
A explicitly declared non-normative description/summary of the CSS3
keywords should be included.
'color-profile`:
<name>: if none is found should resort back to `auto` rather than
limiting a failure remark to 'images' where it could be specified on
non-images, with a failure case.
----This property seems directly ported from SVG and/or ICC (without
reading either spec other than a quick skim in the past), perhaps
re-wording of descriptions to better show full CSS use-cases?
'opacity':
alpha-value error description, >1.0 yields 1.0, less than 0.0
(possible?) yields 0.0
~Justin Wood
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 23:59:10 UTC