- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:18:04 +0200
- To: Brian Sexton <discussion-w3c@ididnotoptin.com>
- Cc: W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
Brian Sexton wrote: >>Then Robin Berjon wrote: >>That's simply not true a single second. Counter-example in real >>implementations: all SVG user agents that I know of do incremental >>rendering, even though an SVG document is of course required to be WF XML. > > The key words you seem to have missed are "strict", "checking", and "be > sure". If an SVG user agent does incremental rendering, it is not checking > for strict well-formedness of the whole document before working with it. I have no idea where you got that strange notion that these steps occur in order. I am well aware of the meaning of the words "strict", "checking", and "be sure". The latter is something you should perhaps consider practising less. There is a requirement that the document be in error when it is discovered that it is no well-formed. There is no requirement that that has to be known before rendering can start to work. You are on crack. -- Robin Berjon
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2004 07:18:39 UTC