- From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:38:50 +0100 (MET)
- To: Daniel Glazman <danielglazman@easyconnect.fr>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
> > E - F > > An element E whose adjacent sibling F immediately > > follows it > > Oh, don't worry, it makes **a lot** of sense. What you > really want here is to make the subject of the selector > E + F become E instead of F. That's right, I didn't express it that clean. > I proposed that eons ago [...] I suspected something like this ;) > It was even included in the very first draft of CSS 3 > selectors but was later removed due to implementation > considerations. IMO the principle Ian mentioned is a strong reason against such a selector, but I also think it's the easiest way to implement that 'functionality'. Basically, I'm glad if there was at least *one* solution for this case, so I accept a way via ':has' and ':matches' pseudo classes as well. Best regards, Jens. -- Jens Meiert Interface Architect http://meiert.com/
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2004 23:44:03 UTC