- From: James Ross <silver@warwickcompsoc.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:38:16 +0100
- To: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> James Ross wrote:
>> <td>
>> <div>Some text</div>
>> -- possible break --
>> <div>More text</div>
>> </td>
>
> I was hoping this was the case, but that wasn't clear to me from the
> spec (and I can think of at least one implementor and WG member who
> thought this was NOT the case based on that spec).
I thought this bit was pretty clear, actually. Perhaps it all hinges on
my interpretation of Rule A's phrase "all the elements generating boxes
that meet at this margin", which I took to mean just the <div>s in the
quote above. The common parent, the <td>, is specifically referred to by
Rule B anyway.
>> If the long text in the 4th <td/> doesn't fit on a page, I would break
>> it using type 2 breaks (line boxes),
>
> Again, that's by no means clear from what the spec says....
This, however, was mostly me going with what I thought should happen.
There is certainly nothing in the spec about how to break when two or
more 'columns' of content has to be dealt with, and I have no idea how
to go about doing such breaking (except on intuition, which isn't
exactly something you can put down in code).
> If James' interepretation is correct, I suggest either this section of
> the specification be reworded to clearly state that the parents of the
> box under consideration do not matter for breaking purposes or that some
> nice examples are added. Or both.
Examples would always be good, especially as we seem to have multiple
interpretations of this already.
--
James Ross <silver@warwickcompsoc.co.uk>
Surely you remember how to speak. I am finding it difficult to carry
both sides of this conversation.
-- Mr. Yotsuya
(Maison Ikkoku, by Rumiko Takahashi)
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2004 15:38:41 UTC