- From: James Ross <silver@warwickcompsoc.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:38:16 +0100
- To: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
Boris Zbarsky wrote: > James Ross wrote: >> <td> >> <div>Some text</div> >> -- possible break -- >> <div>More text</div> >> </td> > > I was hoping this was the case, but that wasn't clear to me from the > spec (and I can think of at least one implementor and WG member who > thought this was NOT the case based on that spec). I thought this bit was pretty clear, actually. Perhaps it all hinges on my interpretation of Rule A's phrase "all the elements generating boxes that meet at this margin", which I took to mean just the <div>s in the quote above. The common parent, the <td>, is specifically referred to by Rule B anyway. >> If the long text in the 4th <td/> doesn't fit on a page, I would break >> it using type 2 breaks (line boxes), > > Again, that's by no means clear from what the spec says.... This, however, was mostly me going with what I thought should happen. There is certainly nothing in the spec about how to break when two or more 'columns' of content has to be dealt with, and I have no idea how to go about doing such breaking (except on intuition, which isn't exactly something you can put down in code). > If James' interepretation is correct, I suggest either this section of > the specification be reworded to clearly state that the parents of the > box under consideration do not matter for breaking purposes or that some > nice examples are added. Or both. Examples would always be good, especially as we seem to have multiple interpretations of this already. -- James Ross <silver@warwickcompsoc.co.uk> Surely you remember how to speak. I am finding it difficult to carry both sides of this conversation. -- Mr. Yotsuya (Maison Ikkoku, by Rumiko Takahashi)
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2004 15:38:41 UTC