- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Chris Lilley wrote: > > One of the reasons we need a component extensions framework is that it > is not currently possible to integrate functionality like view source, > search, etc. Each plugin has its own method, and doesn't even get to > add its method onto the menu when its component has focus. > > Yes, typically you will right click or otherwise bring up a context > menu to get view source for svg. And since I didn't even have a plugin, I had to do it the old-fashioned way anyway. :-) >>> Not at that level of detail, no. Not yet. But then, its already more >>> than the published CSS 2.1 test suite has ;-) so I guess CSS 2.1 >>> should be an empty spec by your criteria? ;-) / 2 >> >> We will indeed be removing features from CSS2.1 if, when we try to exit >> CR, features have not been tested to that level of detail. (See the CR >> exit criteria.) > > And to do that, you will need a test suite. Thankfully, that's one of the things I'm paid to write... -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL U+1047E /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 31 October 2003 14:20:05 UTC