- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 02:07:09 +0200
- To: Daniel Glazman <danielglazman@easyconnect.fr>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, daniel@glazman.org
On Thursday, October 23, 2003, 9:29:34 AM, Daniel wrote: DG> Tantek Çelik wrote: >> Which do you think is more successful in the market? >> >> Which do you think is easier to author? >> >> Which is showing active development (new specs, features being published)? >> >> Which is more actively discussed on mailing lists? DG> LOL!!!! Even funnier if you give the answers. DG> I could add a corollary to the first question above : if you are DG> not a professionnal of markup languages, have you _ever_ viewed a DG> web page styled with a style language not being CSS ? If you have viewed a page that was styled by XSLT into 'HTML for presentation' then how would you know? Although it might well have some CSS too, thus counting in both categories. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2003 20:07:33 UTC