- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 16:23:49 +0000 (UTC)
- To: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, fantasai wrote: > [1] Testcase: > http://fantasai.tripod.com/www-style/2003/background-attachment.html > > With "background-attachment: scroll", these browsers scroll > the background with the content: > Mozilla (& Netscape et al.) * > IE Win > These follow the CSS2.1 draft's wording: > Opera 7.0 > MacIE > Safari > > * Although Mozilla actually does both at once (See Ian's test case: > http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/css/background/block/002.html ) > transparent background images are rare enough that in almost > all cases, the perception is that it scrolls the background > with the content like IE Win. Actually, as of about 26 hours ago (two hours after you sent your e-mail), Mozilla follows the CSS2.1 wording as well. So only WinIE does the scrolling thing now. > Mozilla: > Previous versions of Mozilla behaved like Opera and Safari. > Recent ones position the background image within the padding > box but tile it into the border area. For the record, Mozilla's behaviour is actually dependent on the values of '-moz-background-clip' and '-moz-background-origin', whose initial values are currently somewhat arbitrarily the same as the proposed CSS2.1 model. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL U+1047E /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 12 October 2003 12:23:57 UTC