- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 01:08:50 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Chavchanidze Giorgi <chav@ictp.trieste.it>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, 1:14:29 PM, Ian wrote: IH> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Chavchanidze Giorgi wrote: >> >> No browser supports XLink it since it too complex and no one wants to >> use it since it's too awkward. IH> Mozilla has supported simple XLinks for years, as have most SVG IH> implementations. All SVG implementation, including SVG Basic implementations on PDAs and SVG Tiny implementations on cellphones. IH> Extended XLink is another matter of course. Yes, XBRL uses it, SVG 1.2 will likely use extended inline XLink, not too many other implementations that I am aware of. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 19:08:55 UTC