- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:20:56 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org, John Lewis <lewi0371@mrs.umn.edu>
On Monday, January 6, 2003, 4:36:20 AM, John wrote: JL> Shelby wrote on Sunday, January 5, 2003 at 11:55:59 AM: >> Thus CSS "display" controls semantics because it admits it is not >> conforming (in this case). JL> I disagree, for a very simple reason: CSS does not say *why* UAs may JL> ignore the display property. JL> You assume it's because doing so would cause them to be nonconforming. JL> I assume it's because UAs that have gone to the trouble of JL> implementing all of CSS except the display property should be allowed JL> to call themselves conforming UAs. We're both equally wrong to assume JL> anything. At face value, the sentence is a grant of power to HTML UAs, JL> and nothing more. I can assert with confidence, because I was in the room at the time that this weasel wording was added, that the intent was as John suggested and not as Shelby proposed. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Monday, 6 January 2003 10:20:55 UTC