- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 07:27:29 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
Brent Boyer <brentboyer@hotmail.com> (by way of Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>) wrote: > so that document structure is used to accumulate styles on content. I > strenuously object to corrupting document structure (which should only I would tend to consider that any styling that didn't reflect the document structure was likely to be gratuitous. In traditonal media, before the web, one of the basic rules was that you used only a very small number of font, etc., variations, and you used them consistently; by bringing inexperienced people into design, the web has resulted in the almost random use of large numbers of different effects. I also note that the examples do not reflect any consistent use of styling, but simply give shorthand names to effects; my understanding is that the intention behind classes was to enrichen the semantic structure (HTML itself is lightweight in this respect, compared with other XML and SGML applications), not as a shorthand for particular visual effects. [Not copied direct.]
Received on Monday, 14 October 2002 02:40:57 UTC