Re[2]: SVG fonts embeddable in XHTML-documents?

Chris Lilley responded to me on 18 March 2002:

> EW> My question is whether 
> EW> a fragment identifier is necessary in the URI reference when 
> EW> the 'font' element is the root element.
> Such a file would not be a conforming SVG file.

I fail to see the importance of that fact.  If the document is valid 
and the semantics of the elements are understood, what is 
the harm?  Why should we prevent the exchange of such an 
entity as a font?

Etan Wexler

Received on Sunday, 17 March 2002 20:48:09 UTC