- From: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 20:46:38 -0500
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Web style list <www-style@w3.org>
Chris Lilley responded to me on 18 March 2002: > EW> My question is whether > EW> a fragment identifier is necessary in the URI reference when > EW> the 'font' element is the root element. > > Such a file would not be a conforming SVG file. I fail to see the importance of that fact. If the document is valid and the semantics of the elements are understood, what is the harm? Why should we prevent the exchange of such an entity as a font? -- Etan Wexler
Received on Sunday, 17 March 2002 20:48:09 UTC