- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 02:18:59 +0000
- To: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
- CC: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Web style list <www-style@w3.org>
Etan Wexler wrote: > Chris Lilley responded to me on 18 March 2002: >>> My question is whether a fragment identifier is necessary in the URI >>> reference when the 'font' element is the root element >> >> Such a file would not be a conforming SVG file. > > I fail to see the importance of that fact. If the document is valid-- The document is not valid. -- Ian Hickson ``The inability of a user agent to implement part of this specification due to the limitations of a particular device (e.g., non interactive user agents will probably not implement dynamic pseudo-classes because they make no sense without interactivity) does not imply non-conformance.'' -- Selectors, Sec13
Received on Sunday, 17 March 2002 21:19:12 UTC