Re: SVG fonts embeddable in XHTML-documents?

Etan Wexler wrote:
 > Chris Lilley responded to me on 18 March 2002:
 >>> My question is whether a fragment identifier is necessary in the URI
 >>> reference when the 'font' element is the root element
 >> Such a file would not be a conforming SVG file.
 > I fail to see the importance of that fact.  If the document is valid--

The document is not valid.

Ian Hickson
``The inability of a user agent to implement part of this specification due to
the limitations of a particular device (e.g., non interactive user agents will
probably not implement dynamic pseudo-classes because they make no sense
without interactivity) does not imply non-conformance.'' -- Selectors, Sec13

Received on Sunday, 17 March 2002 21:19:12 UTC