- From: Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:51:16 +0000
- To: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Monday 24 September 2001 21:27, Etan Wexler wrote: | Vladimir Plessky wrote: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ My name is Vadim. | > On Saturday 22 September 2001 15:42, Rock Lyrics Page wrote: | > | I would like to propose that in CSS 3 you make the Colored | > I guess scrollbar should be handled in the same way as current CSS | box. | > model, with some exceptions and, may be, additions : | | The scrollbar should always and ever be a product of the user agent. | Both the original suggestion (the painfully ignorant "Internet | Explorer accepts it so why not make it legal.") and the ostensible | improvement are needless and baseless. What's wrong when "scrollbar is handled in the same way as current CSS box"? * By default, you get your default UserAgent scrollbar (standard Windows MS IE scrollbar, or Netscape's one, etc.) * If you want to theme scrollbar, you apply some CSS definitions to it. * If you don't like some scrollbars on somebody else's page - you can overwrite them with ! important definition in your custom (or default) stylesheet. After all, you can have "custom stylesheet per host/domain name", like Konqueror, for example, manages JavaScript and Java. But I think one custom stylesheet can serve your needs. | | There are just some things that CSS should not do, full stop. -- Vadim Plessky http://kde2.newmail.ru (English) 33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html Do you have Arial font installed? Just test it! http://kde2.newmail.ru/font_test_arial.html
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2001 06:28:00 UTC