- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 17:23:20 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- cc: <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > Then I may be misunderstanding section 12. There are profile > definitions, but they are 'Non normative examples' [sic!]. What's the > purpose of these profiles? What will a conforming user-agent be? Section > 13 only says, device-limitations don't imply non-conformance so I > suppose a conforming user agent must implement all selectors applicable > for a distinct device. Maybe I need some education on this... A fully compliant UA implements the spec completely (as described in the conformance section). A UA that implements the XYZ profile of the spec implements everything that profile XYZ says it must implement. It is not a full implementation. Does that explain it enough? It's quite simple really... -- Ian Hickson )\ _. - ._.) fL Invited Expert, CSS Working Group /. `- ' ( `--' The views expressed in this message are strictly `- , ) - > ) \ personal and not those of Netscape or Mozilla. ________ (.' \) (.' -' ______
Received on Friday, 25 May 2001 20:19:46 UTC