- From: David Bindel <chaosdb@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
- To: www-style@w3.org
I'm not sure that I totally understand your situation, but I think it sounds like your designers want to use classes to apply a specific style to a table cell (<td>, probably for sizing, color, and borders) and then apply a different style to the information contained inside that cell (through <span class="mystyle">, probably for text positioning, size, font, color, etc.) If that is the case, I would definitely agree with your designers, because using the STYLE attribute is no longer legal as of the release of XHTML 1.1, but I'm drifting off topic. Another thing - make sure your are not using tables (i.e. the <td> tag) for page layout and positioning things on your pages. CSS is a much simpler, more supported way of accomplishing things. And CSS positioned pages are more likely to rank high on search engines. Good luck, David Bindel (chaosdb@yahoo.com) --- Aaron Starner <cfdjlist@hotmail.com> wrote: <HR> <html><DIV>Why would I need to use the "CLASS" attribute? </DIV>I have an embedded style sheet in an HTML (actually a CFML) page. <DIV></DIV>Each value is dynamically populated from a database. <DIV></DIV>I'm not currently using any (sub?) classes for each element. <DIV></DIV> <P>Everything is working fine, but our designers want there to be classes, so that each <td> (for example) has a CLASS attribute and the content inside that <td> has a <span Class=> tag.</P> <P>Why would I need those?! The style code I'm using isn't THAT complex.</P> <P>(Is that enough information for you guys?)</P> <P>Aaron</P><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p></html> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2001 17:59:18 UTC