- From: Jonas Sicking <sicking@bigfoot.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 22:55:46 +0100
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
First of all, sorry for posting this so close to the deadline. I'm very impressed by the draft as a whole (especially :not ), however there is one thing that I find a bit strange. The syntax for :nth-child(an+b) when a or b is negative is a bit unintuitive. I'm guessing the syntax was designed to allow selecting ranges of objects, such as :nth-child(-n+6) to select the first six children. However I think the synax isn't very easy to read and also requires three psudos to match "child 3 to 5": :nth-child(-n+5):not(:nth-child(-n+2)) I propose the following synax instead :nth-child(an+b to c) where a, b and c must be positive or zero. That would allow the following selectors :nth-child(2n+1) /* every odd child */ :nth-child(4n) /* every fourth child child */ :nth-child(5n+2 to 3) /* child number 2,3,7,8,12,13.... */ :nth-child(10 to 20) /* child 10,11...20 */ :nth-child(5n+0 to 4) /* selects every child */ :nth-child(2n+3) /* every odd child */ The definition would in other words be that that the selector matches if there is an+b-1 to an+c-1 children before in the document tree for integer n. Optionally b and c could be restriced to be less then a (unless a=0). This syntax however could not match :nth-child(-2n+6) from the current WD without using two pseudos : :nth-child(even):nth-child(1 to 6) But I think that wanting to match "child 3 to 5" is more common then "every even child less then 6" On a completly other topic: I think the :empty pseudo need some definition of what is considered empty. Which of the following elements are considered empty? <E> </E> <E xml:space="preserve"> </E> <E><!-- comment --></E> <E><?myPI?></E> <!ENTITY emptyEntity ""> <!ENTITY wsEntity " "> <E>&emptyEntity;</E> <E>&wsEntity;</E> / Jonas Sicking
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2001 16:55:40 UTC