- From: Robin Berjon <robin@knowscape.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 17:16:09 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
At 16:32 02/02/2001 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote: >Robin Berjon wrote: >> Just a small detail. The .class notation is said to be only applicable to >> HTML. > >That is incorrect (and I thought we fixed that in the CSS2 eratta already). >There are several XML namespaces where .class is used. That's fine, but my question was perhaps of a more generic nature. Specific XML vocabularies are of course entitled to decide that they have an attribute functionally equivalent to HTML's class so that specialized processors will know that they must apply .classes. However, in the case of a generic XML+CSS browser, would it be correct/a good idea/recommendable to apply a given style to an element if it had a xhtml:class='class' attribute ? -- robin b. Designing pages in HTML is like having sex in a bathtub. If you don't know anything about sex, it won't do you any good to know a lot about bathtubs.
Received on Friday, 2 February 2001 11:15:31 UTC