- From: Rowland Shaw <Rowland.Shaw@seagatesoftware.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:46:39 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
depends how you view the argument really... they may have moved from defaulting to a font that may not be installed (say Arial for sans-serif) to the first font that matches the family -- which *may* be the last serif font installed for matching serif -- now, if that font is misdescribing itself you have your problem. Which is the bigger bug? barfing if Arial has been removed from the system, or: presenting a font which it believes to be of the correct font family?? -----Original Message----- From: pdf@bizfon.com [mailto:pdf@bizfon.com] Sent: 13 October 2000 16:24 To: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: Font bug in IE 5.5 Unfortunately, the offending site is not one that I created. So I have no way of changing their odd use of fonts. I have seen it argued that this is not really a Microsoft bug, but the bug of a handful of fonts. But if that was the case, why wouldn't I see this problem in IE 5.0? This tells me that IE is doing something it shouldn't, and therefore, the bug needs to be fixed in IE. Peter Foti Clover Andrew <aclover@1VALUE.com> on 10/13/2000 04:11:00 AM To: "'www-style@w3.org'" <www-style@w3.org> cc: (bcc: Peter Foti) Subject: Re: Font bug in IE 5.5 pdf@bizfon.com wrote: > I apologize in advance for posting this to the list, but I don't know > where to look for info on this. comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets, although I haven't seen an answer there. > font-family: serif,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; I've had this problem too. It happens any time IE 5.5 uses the 'serif' generic font family, not just if it's the first in the list. I'm not sure it happens on all IE5.5 installations, but it happens enough that it's worth avoiding. I put a Windows-specific font name immediately before serif to avoid it ever choosing that, eg: font-family: "GoodFont", "CrapFont", "Times New Roman", serif Microsoft seems not to have acknowledged this (IMHO serious) bug. By the way, I'm not sure putting *two* generic font-family names in the list above makes much sense. -- Andrew Clover Technical Support 1VALUE.com AG
Received on Friday, 13 October 2000 11:47:27 UTC