- From: Matthew Brealey <thelawnet@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:45:42 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
--- "Eric A. Meyer" <emeyer@sr71.lit.cwru.edu> wrote: > >5.5 Descendant selectors > > I suggest "Descendant combinators" instead of > "Descendant selectors" > > and more generally use "combinators" when > appropriate (5.5 -> 5.7) > > For page titles, I went with reproducing the > section titles in the > specification, but I'm willing to be talked out of > that approach if enough > people agree with you. This is an interesting if entirely inconsequential question. I would agree (with Daniel). According to the CSS grammar. BODY P is a selector, with BODY a simple selector, P a simple selector, and ' ' a combinator (defined thus in the grammar: : '+' S* | '>' S* | /* empty */) ===== ---------------------------------------------------------- From Matthew Brealey (http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet (for law)or http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet/WEBFRAME.HTM (for CSS)) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
Received on Monday, 22 November 1999 12:45:44 UTC