- From: Erik van der Poel <erik@netscape.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 17:06:31 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
CSS2, section 15.3.1: Note that if the font 'Robson Celtic' had been installed on the client system, this would have caused the UA to add an entry in the font database for the installed copy as described in the section on the font matching algorithm. The installed copy would have been matched before the downloadable font in the example above. Which part of the CSS2 spec specifies how the various @font-face rules override each other? There are 3 bullets in Step 1. of section 15.5, but it is not clear that the order of these bullets matters. Is it the case that UAs should first look at the @font-face rules for locally installed fonts, then look at any @font-face rules in style sheets linked to or contained in the document, and finally look at the @font-face rules in the UA default style sheet, which includes rules for the generic fonts? Does this mean that the document can specify its own font descriptors for the generic font "serif", and that these descriptors will be used rather than the UA's own descriptors? Thanks, Erik van der Poel Mozilla
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 1999 20:09:31 UTC