- From: Scott Sauer - SSG <ScottSau@clientlogic.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 12:44:50 -0500 (EST)
- To: "'Jelks Cabaniss'" <jelks@jelks.nu>
- Cc: "'www-style@w3.org'" <www-style@w3.org>
I haven't been actually actively following this thread but stumbled across this one. I was having the same thought. To wit, presentation (CSS) and structure (HTML/XML) simply cannot be completely and absolutely separated. I think we've done the best we can, as is, it separate, as much as possible, structure and presentation. I don't, personally, have a good solution short of a "break line" rule being added to CSS w/ some type of offset indicator. In the end, I think "break line" are the grey of the division between structure and presentation, break lines are both. -Scott, ugh > -----Original Message----- > From: Jelks Cabaniss [SMTP:jelks@jelks.nu] > Sent: Friday, February 26, 1999 11:59 AM > To: > Subject: RE: Structure and Style revisited > > > Jelks Cabaniss a écrit : > > > > > ... where "words" could take a single value or a list? Maybe even > have > > > "letters(...)" as well as "words(...)"? > > > > Then we face the same old questions : what is a word, where does it > start > > and where does it end ? If you want to forge answers to that questions, > > please do not forget that english is not the only language in the world > > and that latin alphabet is not the only writing system in the world. > > Excellent point! Using "words" is probably not a viable solution then > (and > there may even be situations where one would want to break *within* > words). > > But the question remains: is a line-break Markup or Style? I think it's > Style > because 1) it's for visual effect, and 2) it's media-dependent. Forced > line > breaks (now days done with <br>) may look fine with screen and print, but > how > does that square with Braille, pagers, and other output devices? > > On the other hand, maybe it's neither Markup *nor* Style, but falls into > another > category -- perhaps like hyphenation ... :) > > > /Jelks
Received on Sunday, 28 February 1999 16:58:01 UTC